Monday, December 17, 2007
The Raw Story | Dodd ready to mount filibuster to block telecom immunity
Well, this speaks for itself. I have to give Dodd a nod :-)
Kick some ass Senator!
6 states defy law requiring ID cards - USATODAY.com
Holy shit! I thought there would be more resistance than that! This is a pretty simple concept. I keep talking about how we are moving towards a society like in the book 1984. I get a LOT of criticism for that. But I am telling you, the ONLY people that will criticize me over that are those that HAVE NOT read the book. Hell, if you watched the fucking movie you would understand. If you have read/seen the story, you would understand that we are moving that way. Read the book and then read the news. Scary shit ain't it? Ya know, if they want national ID cards, state or city ID cards, they might as well just tattoo a fucking number on our forearms like another unfortunate group(Jews in WWII). If you think I'm full of it, then tell me exactly what the difference is. Go on. I'm waiting...
It's the same fucking thing except one number is tattooed on your skin and the other is printed on a card. Either way those numbers/ID's are going to be kept in a database and used to track you. And if you have any other doubts about our road to a police state, just go to Wal-Mart, Stevie-B's Pizza, or the mall. You will be monitored in the parking lot by police in a portable watch tower. People might say "it's for our safety." Fuck that. If they were concerned for our safety, they would hire cops that weren't assholes and keep them on the ground and make them do their job PROPERLY. And what about those stores that want you to show your receipt? People say "just show it and not make a scene" or "it's easier to just show it rather than stand there and argue." Ok, shitwit. What if they started wanting to do pat-down's before you leave? There is not law allowing them to do that either. There is no law making you show your receipt. So why would you let them treat you like a criminal when you've done nothing wrong? Why let them invade your personal being when you've not been accused of a crime? Because it's easier than arguing? Because you don't want to cause a scene? Fuck that! There is no law requiring me to allow them to do any of that shit! How do they get away with it then? Because little pussy sheep let them! If we don't stand up for our most BASIC personal rights, what happens to our major freedom's when they try to restrict them? That is why this fucking country makes me so sick. We are supposed to be the fucking beacon of freedom for the entire world, yet we are less free then half of Europe! Our government makes law after law violating the Bill of Rights and we say nothing. We do nothing. We just say "just go along because it's easier than arguing or making a scene and it's for our safety." Ben Franklin, a founding father of this nation, put forth the idea that those who would sacrifice a little personal freedom for a little personal safety deserve neither freedom nor safety. I totally agree. If you believe the official government story for 9/11(BULLSHIT) then I think the best way to show them our resolve is to not change a thing. We should've just taken it, rebuilt, and kept on with our lives as they were. But, if they goal of a "terrorist" is to change society through violence or threats, then guess what: the "terrorists" have won. We are no longer a free nation. Since 9/11 our society has become a police state. They fucking won. Our government takes away freedom after freedom and says we're more free than ever! How fucking stupid do you have to be to believe that? That's Orwell-ian doublespeak(term from 1984). So, this week's assignment, if you think I'm full of shit, is to read 1984. Then come back and prove me wrong.
Friday, December 14, 2007
AlterNet: Don't We Have a Constitution, Not a King?
The answer: King.
All hail King George I of America!
I hate to tell you people, but it is already too late. The people in power of this country have positioned themselves in such a way that no matter what the public does or wants, the people in power will have what they want anyway. Bush has done the EXACT SAME THING as Hitler did in Germany to become dictator.
Hitler: Set the Reichstag fire and blamed it on Polish jews. He had the governing body give him powers forbidden by their constitution to "protect the homeland." He used those powers to rule as supreme dictator, unchecked by the governing body of Germany.
Bush: I still say that the Bush administration executed 9/11. He then used 9/11 to blame radical muslims as a reason to go to the Middle East and start wars and get Congress to lay down like a $2 whore for whatever he wants and let him do whatever he wants to "protect the homeland." Through signing statements and executive orders(none of which does Congress have a say in) he has given himself dictatorial powers. If you don't believe me, Google his signing statements and executive orders and read them from the government websites themselves. It's all there in black and white. So, unless we get luck and he and Cheney both get impeached or he graciously allows the 2008 elections to continue and we elect Ron Paul or Dennis Kucinich, we are all fucked like that same $2 whore. Now bend over and, no, you don't get any lube!
Norway is a great place. I wonder how difficult it is to learn Norwegian.
Thursday, December 13, 2007
World History With The Pope
This is not a fucking xian nation!!!
1. Check the first amendment to the constitution(taken from the National Archives:
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That says this nation does NOT endorse ANY religion. It as clear as can be.
2. Not all of the founders of this nation were xian. Thomas Jefferson was NOT a xian. He was a deist. BIG difference. A deist says that a deity made the universe but then left it to run on its own. No xianity in that at all.
3. The Treaty of Tripoli, Article 11 clearly states:
As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion,-as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen,-and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.
Now, as that plainly states, this is NOT a xian nation. There is no Church of The United States of America. Many citizens may be xian, but the government is not. That treaty was signed by President Adams and ratified UNANIMOUSLY by the Senate. That's right, UNANIMOUSLY. Needless to say, that hasn't happened many times. Also, the full text of the treaty was published in many newspapers throughout the nation a there was no public bitching about it at all. So, at a time when xianity was as commonplace as breathing, the citizens of the country had no problem with it. Also, the Senate and President of the time had no problem with it.
4. In my opinion Abraham Lincoln was the best President this nation ever had. We could use another Lincoln. Most people in this nation would agree with that. But wait, he wasn't a xian either! That's right! The man who held this nation together and got it through the civil war and who freed the slaves was NOT a xian!
The Bible is not my book nor Christianity my profession.
-- Abraham Lincoln, quoted by Joseph Lewis in "Lincoln the Freethinker"
This shows his understanding of the hypocrisy of praying to a "just god" in war:
Both read the same Bible and pray to the same God, and each invokes his aid against the other. It may seem strange that any men should dare to ask a just God's assistance in wringing their bread from the sweat of other men's faces, but let us judge not that we be not judged.
-- Abraham Lincoln, sarcasm in his Second Innaugural Address (1865)
5. This is a great explanation of what xianity has done to this land. I'd love for the xians to spew some more oral defecation about this comment from the article linked to at the beginning of the rant:
________________
Oh yeah. That comment was a good bitch-slap in the face of the delusional "moral majority" in this nation.
Well, that's about all I can think of to prove that this is NOT a xian nation. Oh, wait! There is the "principles" argument. Those who will agree that the founding fathers didn't make the government xian still say that the nation was founded on xian principles. What exactly are principles that are unique to xianity or were borrowed from xianity? I'm waiting...
Time's up! There ARE NONE! Those assholes should study history a little bit before making claims like that. There is no "xian principle" that was not used before xianity began. Not one. That's one of my main bitches with xians. Xianity does NOT have the monopoly on morality. I'll go into that in a separate rant. So, until next time,
Wake up sheeple!



Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]